Looking a New Year gift horse in the mouth
Pakistan's release of 183 Indian prisoners on Jan 7, 2012 is a welcome step but it also highlights the ongoing issues faced by cross-border prisoners
By Beena Sarwar
On January 8, 2012, 183 Indians crossed the Wagah border from Lahore, bundled up against the bitter cold, many in shawls gifted to them in Pakistan, eager to return home after being released from Pakistani prisons.
Much hard work, persistence and the humanitarian view taken by the Lahore High Court lie behind their release, termed "a New Year gift" from Pakistan to India.
The story of this particular prisoner repatriation started in October 2011, when advocate Awais Sheikh filed a writ petition before the Lahore High Court seeking the release of two Indians, Satinder Paul and Karale Bhanudas, who remained in Pakistani prisons despite having completed their sentence.
On the Lahore High Court's order to provide details on foreign nationals held in Pakistani prisons, Superintendent Jail submitted a list of 74 foreign nationals in prison, including 33 Indians, who had completed their terms of imprisonment.
Chief Justice of the Lahore High Court Ijaz Ahmed Choudry in his order of Nov 14, 2011, directed the release the two prisoners on whose case the petition was based, as well as all foreign prisoners who had completed their terms.
Pakistan's Ministry of Foreign affairs cleared six Indian civilian prisoners for release. However, two of them, Sakhi Muhammad and Bhavesh Kanti Parmar, were not released for "unknown reasons", says Awais Sheikh.
On Jan 7, 2012, Pakistan released 183 Indian prisoners, including Satinder Paul Singh, Sanjeet Kumar, Nasim and Sama Yousaf, and 179 Indian fishermen. They were brought to Wagah border on Jan 8th morning. The First Secretary of Indian High Commission along with three other ICH officers and an officer of Pakistan's Interior Ministry, Islamabad, were also present.
It took them five hours at Wagah to complete the legal formalities at Customs, during which time advocate Awais Sheikh also remained with them. They finally crossed the border at 6.00 p.m.
"It was an unforgettable scene," says Sheikh. "I bid them a hearty farewell with my best wishes. My apologies to them all for being kept in jails even after the completion of awarded sentence. I wish that sanity would prevail and I pray that my voice reaches the governments of both countries".
There are still 276 Indian fishermen in Pakistani jails. "Of these, 83 have already served their sentence but cannot be released because Indian authorities have not confirmed their nationality," explains Justice Zahid. Foreign prisoners can only be freed after respective embassies confirm their identity.
This is also the case in India, which currently has 440 Pakistani fishermen in custody, according to former Pakistan law minister Iqbal Haider. He says that the nationalities of 285 of these prisoners have been determined, but "no assistance can be provided to the remaining 164 until their citizenship is established."
Officials at India's Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) say that India and Pakistan don't want to detain fishermen from the other country. "Once they cross the border, the legal process begins. The process of verifying nationalities involves visiting a fisherman's village to confirm his identity. Often the addresses given are incomplete or very remote. It may take a long time to get there,'' said an MEA official.
But rights activists say that this verification process, which takes six months to a year, only starts after the prisoners have completed their terms.
The process of verifying a prisoner's nationality should begin the moment he is arrested by India or Pakistan. "The process should be complete at the time of a prisoner's release so he does not remain in jail after serving his sentence," says Jatin Desai.
Justice Zahid blames both countries for the delay in releasing innocent fishermen who inadvertently cross national borders while fishing. "These fishermen are usually given a six-month to a year's jail sentence. By the time they are sentenced, they have already served the term," he maintains. "If both governments show interest, the process could be completed in less than a month."
Both the Indian and the Pakistani Supreme Courts have ruled that keeping a prisoner even for a day after he completes his jail term is illegal.
Iqbal Haider has appealed to the Pakistani and Indian governments to release all foreign prisoners over 60 years of age, and to expedite their respective trials by providing them with legal facilities.
Until such steps are not implemented, the issue of cross-border prisoners will remain unresolved. In humanity's name, if not to gain the goodwill of thousands of affected people, both governments must cut the bureaucratic red tape and existing, outdated protocols - the sooner the better.
Both countries routinely arrest each other's fishermen for transgressing maritime boundaries. Released fishermen are routinely repatriated via Wagah border, from where they have to make the tedious overland journey home.
"Gujarat and Karachi are so close to each other, and yet Gujarati fishermen released in Karachi have to travel all the way to Wagah border, and then from Amritsar to Gujarat. Many are from remote villages, and it takes even longer to reach,'' says senior Mumbai-based journalist Jatin Desai, who is joint secretary, Pakistan India People's Forum for Peace and Democracy. "Why should they not be sent back by sea, along with their boats?"
Around 481 Indian fishing boats lie rotting in Karachi harbour. "Each boat costs around 30-40 lakh Indian rupees. Most fishermen are very poor and an entire fishing village chips in to buy a boat," observes retired Supreme Court of Pakistan Justice Nasir Aslam Zahid.
Justice Zahid, chairman of the Committee for Welfare of Prisoners and a member of the Indo-Pak Joint Judicial Committee comprising eight retired judges - four each from India and Pakistan examining the issue of cross-border prisoners - points out that "even if both countries release all the captive fisherfolk, others will continue to be arrested."
He suggests setting up a joint committee of officials from India and Pakistan stationed aboard a ship between the two countries to decide cases of fishermen accidentally straying across the maritime border. "The matter can be settled in the sea itself."
Pakistan Fisherfolk Forum President Muhammad Ali Shah, hoping that India will also release the Pakistani fishermen in Indian jails, suggests that both countries should allow each other's fishermen to catch fish at a small scale in 50 nautical miles in other's waters, rather than criminalising this transgression.
A year ago, India and Pakistan agreed to set up a task force with two members each from Pakistan and India to improve the situation. "Pakistan has already nominated its members but India is yet to do so," says Jatin Desai.
Indian and Pakistani peace activists in a joint press statement of October 2011 had urged their governments to release the fishermen and their boats. Both governments "need to recognise the fact that these traditional fishermen go to the mid-sea for their livelihood. Arresting them and confiscating their boats means depriving their families from the livelihood, and causing them extreme distress," said the statement... "The issue of fishermen needs to be seen from the humanitarian, not security angle."
Not included in the list of prisoners to be released were the two Sikh prisoners. One of them is Sarabjit Singh convicted for bomb blasts in Pakistan in 1990 even though the FIR does not mention his name but that of a Manjeet Singh (Surjit Singh says he is the victim of a mistaken identity; see report 'Why is Gopal Das free and not Dr Chishty?' by Shivam Vij). The other prisoner, who has languished for four decadese, is Surjit Singh, a jawan of India's Border Security Force (BSF), taken prisoner of war in 1971 and given up for dead in 1974. In April 2011, he was found to be alive, in Kot Lakhpat Jail, Lahore, after Khushi Mohammad, an Indian prisoner released by Pakistan on his return mentioned the names of some of his compatriots still in Pakistani prisons.
Both Sarabjit and Surjit have now spent decades in prison, far beyond life imprisonment terms. Pakistan must repatriate them immediately, as human rights activists and lawyers on both sides are demanding.
In addition, both countries must look into the issue of the 'forgotten' prisoners of war.
In June 2011, Brian MacMahon, a former master mariner from India, now based in Australia, appealed to the Presidents of India and Pakistan to make efforts to locate and release the POWs on either side, and if they were no longer living, to provide information and their remains to their families in order to get some closure on their missing loved ones.
He cited the example of Australia, which has brought home the remains of every one of its servicemen missing in action 38 years after the conflict in Vietnam (which ended in 1971).
'Missing' Indian POWs who have been 'sighted' in Pakistan over the years include Major S. P. S. Waraich , Capt Kamal Bakshi, Subedar Assa Singh, and Wing Commander H. S. Gill. The 'discovery' of Surjit Singh ignites hope that they and their other colleagues may similarly be alive and undocumented in a Pakistani prison.
In September 2004, then Defence Minister of India, Pranab Mukherjee told reporters that an estimated "17 army officers, two junior commissioned officers and 19 other rank officers are currently in Pakistani jails."
There are Pakistani POWs in India too. In June 2010, The Daily Mail Today, New Delhi, reported that 18 Pakistan Army personnel taken as prisoners of war in 1965 and 1971 were still in Indian custody, as confirmed by the Indian Ministry of Defence. This is "contrary to all norms of humanity as well in direct contravention of the Geneva Convention... these POWs also include two Majors who went missing during the wars" (June 24, 2010).
Given the number of cases where missing presumed dead armed forces personnel have been found alive in one prison or another, isn't it time for both countries to make concerted efforts to get these men back - if for no other reason, then in the name of humanity?
Monday, January 16, 2012
By Beena Sarwar
On January 8, 2012, 183 Indians crossed the Wagah border from Lahore, bundled up against the bitter cold, many in shawls gifted to them in Pakistan, eager to return home after being released from Pakistani prisons.
Much hard work, persistence and the humanitarian view taken by the Lahore High Court lie behind their release, termed "a New Year gift" from Pakistan to India.
The story of this particular prisoner repatriation started in October 2011, when advocate Awais Sheikh filed a writ petition before the Lahore High Court seeking the release of two Indians, Satinder Paul and Karale Bhanudas, who remained in Pakistani prisons despite having completed their sentence.
On the Lahore High Court's order to provide details on foreign nationals held in Pakistani prisons, Superintendent Jail submitted a list of 74 foreign nationals in prison, including 33 Indians, who had completed their terms of imprisonment.
Chief Justice of the Lahore High Court Ijaz Ahmed Choudry in his order of Nov 14, 2011, directed the release the two prisoners on whose case the petition was based, as well as all foreign prisoners who had completed their terms.
Pakistan's Ministry of Foreign affairs cleared six Indian civilian prisoners for release. However, two of them, Sakhi Muhammad and Bhavesh Kanti Parmar, were not released for "unknown reasons", says Awais Sheikh.
On Jan 7, 2012, Pakistan released 183 Indian prisoners, including Satinder Paul Singh, Sanjeet Kumar, Nasim and Sama Yousaf, and 179 Indian fishermen. They were brought to Wagah border on Jan 8th morning. The First Secretary of Indian High Commission along with three other ICH officers and an officer of Pakistan's Interior Ministry, Islamabad, were also present.
It took them five hours at Wagah to complete the legal formalities at Customs, during which time advocate Awais Sheikh also remained with them. They finally crossed the border at 6.00 p.m.
"It was an unforgettable scene," says Sheikh. "I bid them a hearty farewell with my best wishes. My apologies to them all for being kept in jails even after the completion of awarded sentence. I wish that sanity would prevail and I pray that my voice reaches the governments of both countries".
Justice delayed
There are still 276 Indian fishermen in Pakistani jails. "Of these, 83 have already served their sentence but cannot be released because Indian authorities have not confirmed their nationality," explains Justice Zahid. Foreign prisoners can only be freed after respective embassies confirm their identity.
This is also the case in India, which currently has 440 Pakistani fishermen in custody, according to former Pakistan law minister Iqbal Haider. He says that the nationalities of 285 of these prisoners have been determined, but "no assistance can be provided to the remaining 164 until their citizenship is established."
Officials at India's Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) say that India and Pakistan don't want to detain fishermen from the other country. "Once they cross the border, the legal process begins. The process of verifying nationalities involves visiting a fisherman's village to confirm his identity. Often the addresses given are incomplete or very remote. It may take a long time to get there,'' said an MEA official.
But rights activists say that this verification process, which takes six months to a year, only starts after the prisoners have completed their terms.
The process of verifying a prisoner's nationality should begin the moment he is arrested by India or Pakistan. "The process should be complete at the time of a prisoner's release so he does not remain in jail after serving his sentence," says Jatin Desai.
Justice Zahid blames both countries for the delay in releasing innocent fishermen who inadvertently cross national borders while fishing. "These fishermen are usually given a six-month to a year's jail sentence. By the time they are sentenced, they have already served the term," he maintains. "If both governments show interest, the process could be completed in less than a month."
Both the Indian and the Pakistani Supreme Courts have ruled that keeping a prisoner even for a day after he completes his jail term is illegal.
Iqbal Haider has appealed to the Pakistani and Indian governments to release all foreign prisoners over 60 years of age, and to expedite their respective trials by providing them with legal facilities.
Until such steps are not implemented, the issue of cross-border prisoners will remain unresolved. In humanity's name, if not to gain the goodwill of thousands of affected people, both governments must cut the bureaucratic red tape and existing, outdated protocols - the sooner the better.
Fishy business
Both countries routinely arrest each other's fishermen for transgressing maritime boundaries. Released fishermen are routinely repatriated via Wagah border, from where they have to make the tedious overland journey home.
"Gujarat and Karachi are so close to each other, and yet Gujarati fishermen released in Karachi have to travel all the way to Wagah border, and then from Amritsar to Gujarat. Many are from remote villages, and it takes even longer to reach,'' says senior Mumbai-based journalist Jatin Desai, who is joint secretary, Pakistan India People's Forum for Peace and Democracy. "Why should they not be sent back by sea, along with their boats?"
Around 481 Indian fishing boats lie rotting in Karachi harbour. "Each boat costs around 30-40 lakh Indian rupees. Most fishermen are very poor and an entire fishing village chips in to buy a boat," observes retired Supreme Court of Pakistan Justice Nasir Aslam Zahid.
Justice Zahid, chairman of the Committee for Welfare of Prisoners and a member of the Indo-Pak Joint Judicial Committee comprising eight retired judges - four each from India and Pakistan examining the issue of cross-border prisoners - points out that "even if both countries release all the captive fisherfolk, others will continue to be arrested."
He suggests setting up a joint committee of officials from India and Pakistan stationed aboard a ship between the two countries to decide cases of fishermen accidentally straying across the maritime border. "The matter can be settled in the sea itself."
Pakistan Fisherfolk Forum President Muhammad Ali Shah, hoping that India will also release the Pakistani fishermen in Indian jails, suggests that both countries should allow each other's fishermen to catch fish at a small scale in 50 nautical miles in other's waters, rather than criminalising this transgression.
A year ago, India and Pakistan agreed to set up a task force with two members each from Pakistan and India to improve the situation. "Pakistan has already nominated its members but India is yet to do so," says Jatin Desai.
Indian and Pakistani peace activists in a joint press statement of October 2011 had urged their governments to release the fishermen and their boats. Both governments "need to recognise the fact that these traditional fishermen go to the mid-sea for their livelihood. Arresting them and confiscating their boats means depriving their families from the livelihood, and causing them extreme distress," said the statement... "The issue of fishermen needs to be seen from the humanitarian, not security angle."
The POWS issue
Not included in the list of prisoners to be released were the two Sikh prisoners. One of them is Sarabjit Singh convicted for bomb blasts in Pakistan in 1990 even though the FIR does not mention his name but that of a Manjeet Singh (Surjit Singh says he is the victim of a mistaken identity; see report 'Why is Gopal Das free and not Dr Chishty?' by Shivam Vij). The other prisoner, who has languished for four decadese, is Surjit Singh, a jawan of India's Border Security Force (BSF), taken prisoner of war in 1971 and given up for dead in 1974. In April 2011, he was found to be alive, in Kot Lakhpat Jail, Lahore, after Khushi Mohammad, an Indian prisoner released by Pakistan on his return mentioned the names of some of his compatriots still in Pakistani prisons.
Both Sarabjit and Surjit have now spent decades in prison, far beyond life imprisonment terms. Pakistan must repatriate them immediately, as human rights activists and lawyers on both sides are demanding.
In addition, both countries must look into the issue of the 'forgotten' prisoners of war.
In June 2011, Brian MacMahon, a former master mariner from India, now based in Australia, appealed to the Presidents of India and Pakistan to make efforts to locate and release the POWs on either side, and if they were no longer living, to provide information and their remains to their families in order to get some closure on their missing loved ones.
He cited the example of Australia, which has brought home the remains of every one of its servicemen missing in action 38 years after the conflict in Vietnam (which ended in 1971).
'Missing' Indian POWs who have been 'sighted' in Pakistan over the years include Major S. P. S. Waraich , Capt Kamal Bakshi, Subedar Assa Singh, and Wing Commander H. S. Gill. The 'discovery' of Surjit Singh ignites hope that they and their other colleagues may similarly be alive and undocumented in a Pakistani prison.
In September 2004, then Defence Minister of India, Pranab Mukherjee told reporters that an estimated "17 army officers, two junior commissioned officers and 19 other rank officers are currently in Pakistani jails."
There are Pakistani POWs in India too. In June 2010, The Daily Mail Today, New Delhi, reported that 18 Pakistan Army personnel taken as prisoners of war in 1965 and 1971 were still in Indian custody, as confirmed by the Indian Ministry of Defence. This is "contrary to all norms of humanity as well in direct contravention of the Geneva Convention... these POWs also include two Majors who went missing during the wars" (June 24, 2010).
Given the number of cases where missing presumed dead armed forces personnel have been found alive in one prison or another, isn't it time for both countries to make concerted efforts to get these men back - if for no other reason, then in the name of humanity?
Monday, January 16, 2012
Students to paint messages on handkerchiefs
By our correspondent
TOBA TEK SINGH: Hundreds of students, including boys and girls, will take part in a programme being held at Saint Peter's High School h .....more
By our correspondentTOBA TEK SINGH: Hundreds of students, including boys and girls, will take part in a programme being held at Saint Peter's High School h .....more
Virsa paves the way for Indo-Pak co-productions
Amar Ayaz
Karachi: Virsa, the first international Punjabi film and co-production between Indian and Pakistani producers, had a worldwide release on May 7th which, .....more
Amar AyazKarachi: Virsa, the first international Punjabi film and co-production between Indian and Pakistani producers, had a worldwide release on May 7th which, .....more
Hank-ering for peace
By Rabia Ali
KARACHI: Melodic songs reverberated as hundreds of children scrambled to show off their messages on white handkerchiefs - all calling for peace .....more
By Rabia AliKARACHI: Melodic songs reverberated as hundreds of children scrambled to show off their messages on white handkerchiefs - all calling for peace .....more
India ready for composite talks with Pakistan
ISLAMABAD: India at last was brought round to restore the process of negotiations with Pakistan, Geo News reported Tuesday.
India's External Affairs Minister SM Kr .....more
ISLAMABAD: India at last was brought round to restore the process of negotiations with Pakistan, Geo News reported Tuesday.India's External Affairs Minister SM Kr .....more
Dishonouring life
Honour killing has nothing to do with Islam or any other religion; it is an inherent human emotion which leads to murders across the board. You! takes a look...
.....more
Honour killing has nothing to do with Islam or any other religion; it is an inherent human emotion which leads to murders across the board. You! takes a look...
.....more
Likely solution: STATUS QUO, MIDDLE PATH or REFERENDUM?
STATUS QUO
Converting the LoC, which was called ceasefire line before the Shimla agreement, into a permanent border and recognising Islamabad's legitimacy over ter .....more
STATUS QUOConverting the LoC, which was called ceasefire line before the Shimla agreement, into a permanent border and recognising Islamabad's legitimacy over ter .....more
Page 155 of 174
Special Editions
more editions
The News on Sunday Special Report: India Pakistan prisoners
We probably didn't need to do this Special Report. Newspaper stories don't matter when it comes to Indians in Pakistani jails and vice versa. In fact, 'vice versa' sums it up. We do to them what they do to us.
Except when the two countries decide to begin talking, yet again! This time a little before the foreign secretary level talks, some Pakistani prisoners were released by India (and vice versa must have happened) and some more were release....read more
Blog
more
For the past 2 years the Jang Group and Geo have been working on a project of great national interest; one that we hope will help usher in an era of peace and prosperity in the country and indeed, in the region. And one that hopefully all Pakistanis can be proud of.
The Jang Group has entered into an agreement with the Times of India Group, the largest media group of India, to campaign for peace betw
Global Media
Comments